Skip to content

Research

Foundational research and analysis that guides AirsDSP development.

Overview

This section contains comprehensive research on the Demonstrate-Search-Predict (DSP) framework, including analysis of the original paper, comparative studies, and architectural insights.

Research Categories

Core Framework Research

Understanding the foundational DSP framework and its principles.

Evolution & Comparison

How DSP evolved and how it compares to related approaches.

Architecture & Design

Architectural patterns and design strategies for DSP implementations.

Implementation Strategies

Practical strategies for implementing DSP components.

Product Strategy

Strategic positioning and differentiation for AirsDSP.

Research Purpose

This research serves to:

  1. Foundation: Provide comprehensive understanding of DSP principles
  2. Guidance: Inform implementation decisions with research-backed insights
  3. Differentiation: Clarify AirsDSP's unique approach vs DSPy
  4. Performance: Document expected performance characteristics
  5. Architecture: Guide architectural and design decisions

Using This Research

For Contributors

  • Read core framework research before implementation
  • Reference architectural patterns during design
  • Use comparative analysis to understand trade-offs
  • Apply implementation strategies in code

For Users

  • Understand the theoretical foundation
  • Learn why AirsDSP makes certain design choices
  • Compare with DSPy to choose the right tool
  • See expected performance characteristics

Research Methodology

All research documents:

  • ✅ Based on published papers and official sources
  • ✅ Include citations and references
  • ✅ Provide concrete examples where possible
  • ✅ Document both strengths and limitations
  • ✅ Connect theory to practical implementation

Key Insights

DSP Core Principles

  1. Systematic Decomposition: Break complex tasks into manageable steps
  2. Strategic Retrieval: Place retrieval where it provides maximum value
  3. Demonstration Guidance: Use examples to constrain model behavior
  4. Natural Language Interface: Components communicate through text
  5. Frozen Models: No fine-tuning required

Performance Expectations

Based on original DSP research:

  • 37-120% relative improvement over vanilla LMs
  • 8-40% gains over simple retrieve-then-read
  • Comparable accuracy to fine-tuned models without training

AirsDSP Differentiation

  • Explicit Control: vs DSPy's automated optimization
  • Architecture-Driven: Accuracy through design, not compilation
  • Production Focus: Predictable behavior for reliability
  • Rust-Native: Type safety and zero-cost abstractions

Contributing Research

Found relevant research or want to add analysis?

See Contributing Guide for details on how to contribute to the project.


Updated: December 2025
Total Documents: 14 research papers
Coverage: Complete DSP framework foundation